Sociology Talk
Sociology Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

A Note to the Peace Movement
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sociology Talk Forum Index -> Bush Politics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
David Hartung
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:29 pm    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

Lamont Cranston wrote:
Quote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
4114 Dead wrote:

Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S. Truman - Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

How do you figure that Korea was lost?

Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B. Johnson - Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

Lost by the Media and a Democrat Congress.

There was no "Democrat Congress."

Which party controlled the Congress from 1970-1975?

The Democratic Party.

Then we had a Democrat Congress.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Lamont Cranston
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:36 pm    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

David Hartung wrote:
Quote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
4114 Dead wrote:

Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S.
Truman -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

How do you figure that Korea was lost?

Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B.
Johnson -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

Lost by the Media and a Democrat Congress.

There was no "Democrat Congress."

Which party controlled the Congress from 1970-1975?

The Democratic Party.

Then we had a Democrat Congress.

No, we had Democratic Congress. (Actually we had a Congress
with a Democratic majority.)
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Gandalf Grey
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:44 pm    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@intheshadows.com> wrote in message
news:g5iqjj$vaf$1@news.datemas.de...
Quote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
4114 Dead wrote:

Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S. Truman -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

How do you figure that Korea was lost?

Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B. Johnson -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

Lost by the Media and a Democrat Congress.

There was no "Democrat Congress."

Which party controlled the Congress from 1970-1975?

The Democratic Party.

Then we had a Democrat Congress.

No, we had Democratic Congress. (Actually we had a Congress with a
Democratic majority.)

Exactly. There is no such thing as a "democrat congress". What we see here
is the childish attempt on the part of the GOP to take a slap at the
Democratic party. The most famous proponent of the "democrat" slur was the
infamous alcoholic demagogue, Joe McCarthy.
>
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


David Hartung
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:44 pm    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

Lamont Cranston wrote:
Quote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
4114 Dead wrote:

Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S. Truman -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

How do you figure that Korea was lost?

Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B. Johnson -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

Lost by the Media and a Democrat Congress.

There was no "Democrat Congress."

Which party controlled the Congress from 1970-1975?

The Democratic Party.

Then we had a Democrat Congress.

No, we had Democratic Congress. (Actually we had a Congress with a
Democratic majority.)

Same thing.

The bottom line is that it was the American left and the media which
lost us Vietnam, In my opinion.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Gandalf Grey
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:47 pm    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

"David Hartung" <d_hartung@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:P-idnUizDZlicuHVnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Quote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
4114 Dead wrote:

Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S. Truman -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

How do you figure that Korea was lost?

Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B. Johnson -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

Lost by the Media and a Democrat Congress.

There was no "Democrat Congress."

Which party controlled the Congress from 1970-1975?

The Democratic Party.

Then we had a Democrat Congress.

No, we had Democratic Congress. (Actually we had a Congress with a
Democratic majority.)

Same thing.

Since there is no such thing as the "Democrat Party" it's not the same thing
and all you're doing is demonstrating your ignorance once again.

Quote:

The bottom line is that it was the American left and the media which lost
us Vietnam, In my opinion.

And since you can't even handle known facts like the subpoena law, your
opinion is worthless.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Lamont Cranston
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:49 pm    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

David Hartung wrote:
Quote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
4114 Dead wrote:

Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S.
Truman -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

How do you figure that Korea was lost?

Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B.
Johnson -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

Lost by the Media and a Democrat Congress.

There was no "Democrat Congress."

Which party controlled the Congress from 1970-1975?

The Democratic Party.

Then we had a Democrat Congress.

No, we had Democratic Congress. (Actually we had a
Congress with a
Democratic majority.)

Same thing.

The bottom line is that it was the American left and the
media which
lost us Vietnam, In my opinion.

The bottom line is we should never have been in Vietnam to
begin with. It's the same bottom line as with Iraq.

The reason that we lost in Vietnam is that the American
people finally realized that we should never have been
there. The justification for being there, the Domino
Theory, was a fraud, just as Iraq's possession of WMDs was a
fraud.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


David Hartung
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:54 pm    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

Lamont Cranston wrote:
Quote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
4114 Dead wrote:

Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S. Truman -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

How do you figure that Korea was lost?

Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B. Johnson -
Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

Lost by the Media and a Democrat Congress.

There was no "Democrat Congress."

Which party controlled the Congress from 1970-1975?

The Democratic Party.

Then we had a Democrat Congress.

No, we had Democratic Congress. (Actually we had a Congress with a
Democratic majority.)

Same thing.

The bottom line is that it was the American left and the media which
lost us Vietnam, In my opinion.

The bottom line is we should never have been in Vietnam to begin with.
It's the same bottom line as with Iraq.

You may be correct, but as of right now, I am not convinced.

Quote:
The reason that we lost in Vietnam is that the American people finally
realized that we should never have been there. The justification for
being there, the Domino Theory, was a fraud, just as Iraq's possession
of WMDs was a fraud.

We lost in Vietnam because Joihnson did not have the spine to do the Job
properly, which is the same reason North Korea is still a separate nation.

had Truman and Johnson done what they should have, Korea would have been
united in 1953, and Vietnam would have been united under a freely
elected government by 1968.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


David Hartung
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:54 pm    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

Gandalf Grey wrote:
Quote:
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@intheshadows.com> wrote in message
news:g5iqjj$vaf$1@news.datemas.de...
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
4114 Dead wrote:

Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S. Truman -
Democrat
Lost by a Republican.
How do you figure that Korea was lost?

Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B. Johnson -
Democrat
Lost by a Republican.
Lost by the Media and a Democrat Congress.
There was no "Democrat Congress."
Which party controlled the Congress from 1970-1975?
The Democratic Party.
Then we had a Democrat Congress.
No, we had Democratic Congress. (Actually we had a Congress with a
Democratic majority.)

Exactly. There is no such thing as a "democrat congress". What we see here
is the childish attempt on the part of the GOP to take a slap at the
Democratic party. The most famous proponent of the "democrat" slur was the
infamous alcoholic demagogue, Joe McCarthy.

What we have here is a thin skinned individual.

Get over it.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


David Hartung
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:57 pm    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

Gandalf Grey wrote:
Quote:
"David Hartung" <d_hartung@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:P-idnUizDZlicuHVnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
4114 Dead wrote:

Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S. Truman -
Democrat
Lost by a Republican.
How do you figure that Korea was lost?

Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B. Johnson -
Democrat
Lost by a Republican.
Lost by the Media and a Democrat Congress.
There was no "Democrat Congress."
Which party controlled the Congress from 1970-1975?
The Democratic Party.
Then we had a Democrat Congress.
No, we had Democratic Congress. (Actually we had a Congress with a
Democratic majority.)
Same thing.

Since there is no such thing as the "Democrat Party" it's not the same thing
and all you're doing is demonstrating your ignorance once again.

While you demonstrate that you have a thin skin.

One of us has a problem, and it is not me.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Gandalf Grey
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:19 am    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

"David Hartung" <d_hartung@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:VNCdnQ_oH5SfbuHVnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@comcast.com...
Quote:
Gandalf Grey wrote:
"David Hartung" <d_hartung@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:P-idnUizDZlicuHVnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
4114 Dead wrote:

Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S. Truman -
Democrat
Lost by a Republican.
How do you figure that Korea was lost?

Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B. Johnson -
Democrat
Lost by a Republican.
Lost by the Media and a Democrat Congress.
There was no "Democrat Congress."
Which party controlled the Congress from 1970-1975?
The Democratic Party.
Then we had a Democrat Congress.
No, we had Democratic Congress. (Actually we had a Congress with a
Democratic majority.)
Same thing.

Since there is no such thing as the "Democrat Party" it's not the same
thing and all you're doing is demonstrating your ignorance once again.

While you demonstrate that you have a thin skin.

The historic attempt on the part of the GOP to use code words to refer to
the Democratic Party has nothing to do with my skin, thick or thin. It has
much more to do with the childishness of the GOP.

Quote:

One of us has a problem, and it is not me.

The problem is that you're either extremely stupid or hypocritical or both.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Gandalf Grey
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:21 am    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

"David Hartung" <d_hartung@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:VNCdnQzoH5Tob-HVnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@comcast.com...
Quote:
Gandalf Grey wrote:
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@intheshadows.com> wrote in message
news:g5iqjj$vaf$1@news.datemas.de...
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
4114 Dead wrote:

Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S. Truman -
Democrat
Lost by a Republican.
How do you figure that Korea was lost?

Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B. Johnson -
Democrat
Lost by a Republican.
Lost by the Media and a Democrat Congress.
There was no "Democrat Congress."
Which party controlled the Congress from 1970-1975?
The Democratic Party.
Then we had a Democrat Congress.
No, we had Democratic Congress. (Actually we had a Congress with a
Democratic majority.)

Exactly. There is no such thing as a "democrat congress". What we see
here is the childish attempt on the part of the GOP to take a slap at the
Democratic party. The most famous proponent of the "democrat" slur was
the infamous alcoholic demagogue, Joe McCarthy.

What we have here is a thin skinned individual.

No. He was both an alcoholic and demagogue. But he wasn't particularly
thin-skinned.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Jim Austin
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:22 am    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

On Jul 14, 6:21 pm, "Gandalf Grey" <valino...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
"Jim Austin" <b...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message

news:36fc2d65-31d8-4f46-9b43-e9342c16b987@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...



On Jul 14, 12:56 pm, "Gandalf Grey" <valino...@gmail.com> wrote:
"Jim Austin" <b...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message

news:da6ef1ee-7a3d-45dd-b966-8ace0d5ceab8@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...

On Jul 14, 9:39 am, "Gandalf Grey" <valino...@gmail.com> wrote:
A Note to the Peace Movement

By David Swanson

Created Jul 13 2008 - 10:58am

The peace movement has stood for peace and justice, for ending wars,
preventing new ones, and building peace.

No. The peace movement has stood for dictatorship and terrorism.

Actually, the GOP has stood for dictatorship and terrorism.

In the 1960s, the peace movement sided with the communist countries
against the United States.

Ronald Reagan's Crime Regime illegally supplied guns for a dictatorship in
direct defiance of the Unites States Congress.

A Democratic Congress did try to criminalize resistance to communist
aggression as they now try to criminalize resistance to terrorism.

Quote:
U.S. Republicans sided with Hitler right up to the point of the beginning of WWII
and some of them even after learning of his murder of millions of innocent human
beings.

A lie.

Pacifists sided with Hitler before and all during World War II. Peace
movement types sought to disarm nations threatened by Nazi Germany
before the war and undermine the effort during the war.

Quote:
Don't try to sell me on the right wing's having clean hands

Peace movements side with aggressors. They share the guilt of
aggression.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Ralph
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:12 am    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

4114 Dead <zepp22114114@finestplanet.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:50:37 -0700, nospam@noway.net (Ralph) wrote:

Gandalf Grey <valinor20@gmail.com> wrote:

We can still work against recruitment, we can still educate, we can still
agitate,

You mean make the war difficut so that more of our soldiers die.

Say no to war unless a democrat is president.


WAR!! WAR!! DEMOCRATS AND WAAAAR!!!!
(the DRAFT included!!)

World War I - 1917 - 116,708 KIA - Woodrow Wilson - Democrat

And won by a Democrat.

I thought that was a draw and the US was a minor player. And as it
turned out, since the Lusatania was found divers have discovered she was
carrying a considerable amount of munitions which means her sinking was
justified which means Woodrow Wilson lied us into World War II.

Quote:
World War II - 1941 - 408,306 -KIA Franklin D. Roosevelt - Democrat

And won by a Democrat.

It was the raw deal the germans got at the end of World War I that led
to World War II. If the US had a stronger military and had the allies
stood up to Hitler sooner it's likely the war would have been over
sooner.

Quote:
Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S. Truman - Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

I thought it was a draw. While the Soviets were sending surplus arms to
North Korea, Truman was turning our military equipment into scrap metal
for the new German economy. Had he recognized the threat and armed South
Korea the war would likely never have happened.

Quote:
Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B. Johnson - Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

Nixon had it won, but was forced to pull out because of political
pressure from the left.

Quote:
The three wars since then have been started and lost by Republicans.

Oh, did we forget Desert Storm and the Cold War?

Quote:
Nixon turned this war around and had it won:
http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/6545/vietnamwarstats8zn.jpg
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


4114 Dead
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:02 am    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:12:22 -0700, nospam@noway.net (Ralph) wrote:

Quote:
4114 Dead <zepp22114114@finestplanet.com> wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:50:37 -0700, nospam@noway.net (Ralph) wrote:

Gandalf Grey <valinor20@gmail.com> wrote:

We can still work against recruitment, we can still educate, we can still
agitate,

You mean make the war difficut so that more of our soldiers die.

Say no to war unless a democrat is president.


WAR!! WAR!! DEMOCRATS AND WAAAAR!!!!
(the DRAFT included!!)

World War I - 1917 - 116,708 KIA - Woodrow Wilson - Democrat

And won by a Democrat.

I thought that was a draw and the US was a minor player. And as it
turned out, since the Lusatania was found divers have discovered she was
carrying a considerable amount of munitions which means her sinking was
justified which means Woodrow Wilson lied us into World War II.

France and England won quite convincingly. America played a
relatively minor role.
Quote:

World War II - 1941 - 408,306 -KIA Franklin D. Roosevelt - Democrat

And won by a Democrat.

It was the raw deal the germans got at the end of World War I that led
to World War II. If the US had a stronger military and had the allies
stood up to Hitler sooner it's likely the war would have been over
sooner.

And if Superman was real, it would have ended even faster!


Quote:
Korean War - 1950 - 54,246 KIA - Harry S. Truman - Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

I thought it was a draw. While the Soviets were sending surplus arms to
North Korea, Truman was turning our military equipment into scrap metal
for the new German economy. Had he recognized the threat and armed South
Korea the war would likely never have happened.

You just defined a draw as a loss discussing ww1.

Quote:
Vietnam War - 1965 - 58,159 KIA - Lyndon B. Johnson - Democrat

Lost by a Republican.

Nixon had it won, but was forced to pull out because of political
pressure from the left.

Nixon had to settle for the same terms the North Vietnamese were
offering in 1968. Too bad he sabotaged the peace talks for political
gain. That was about 20,000 Americans shot to shit so he could enjoy
a little bump in the polls.
Quote:

The three wars since then have been started and lost by Republicans.

Oh, did we forget Desert Storm and the Cold War?

I thought Desert Storm was why you are stuck in the occupation

quagmire in Iraq now. Hardly a victory.

As for the cold war, maybe you could tell us what battles were fought
and how many Russian troops died.

Ha ha ha.

Quote:
Nixon turned this war around and had it won:
http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/6545/vietnamwarstats8zn.jpg
--


What do you call a Republican with a conscience?

An ex-Republican.

http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=8827 (From Yang, AthD (h.c)

"Prosperity and peace are in the balance," -- Putsch, not admitting that he's against both

Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001

Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Gandalf Grey
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject: Re: A Note to the Peace Movement Reply with quote

"Jim Austin" <bja@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:2312d960-ca6f-45e1-a7d2-60d8a8ab594a@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
On Jul 14, 6:21 pm, "Gandalf Grey" <valino...@gmail.com> wrote:
"Jim Austin" <b...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message

news:36fc2d65-31d8-4f46-9b43-e9342c16b987@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...



On Jul 14, 12:56 pm, "Gandalf Grey" <valino...@gmail.com> wrote:
"Jim Austin" <b...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message

news:da6ef1ee-7a3d-45dd-b966-8ace0d5ceab8@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...

On Jul 14, 9:39 am, "Gandalf Grey" <valino...@gmail.com> wrote:
A Note to the Peace Movement

By David Swanson

Created Jul 13 2008 - 10:58am

The peace movement has stood for peace and justice, for ending
wars,
preventing new ones, and building peace.

No. The peace movement has stood for dictatorship and terrorism.

Actually, the GOP has stood for dictatorship and terrorism.

In the 1960s, the peace movement sided with the communist countries
against the United States.

Ronald Reagan's Crime Regime illegally supplied guns for a dictatorship
in
direct defiance of the Unites States Congress.

A Democratic Congress did try to criminalize resistance to communist
aggression as they now try to criminalize resistance to terrorism.

U.S. Republicans sided with Hitler right up to the point of the beginning
of WWII
and some of them even after learning of his murder of millions of
innocent human
beings.

A lie.

Historical truth. Pop quiz, asshole. Charles Lindbergh was a 1.
Republican, or 2. Democrat? Father Charles Coughlin, the radio priest and
arch enemy of FDR was 1. Republican or 2. Democrat? Republicans in Congress
opposed America's involvement in WWII right up to Pearl Harbor, True or
False?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sociology Talk Forum Index -> Bush Politics All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 4 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding Ring
Search Escorts and girls (incall/OutCall) online with Oasi2000, ItaliaChiamami, BestAnnunci...
Swingers and Swinging
Branding
Secured Loans
Make Your Own Website
Free phone calls to Canada
Long island Cleaning service
toxic mold
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
floor machines
Sanitaire Vacuum Parts


Board Security

137 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group