Sociology Talk
Sociology Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

M`I 5`Pers ecution . b ugging and counter- surveillance

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sociology Talk Forum Index -> Sociology Talk -> Future
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:51 am    Post subject: M`I 5`Pers ecution . b ugging and counter- surveillance Reply with quote

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= MI5:. bugging and counter-surveillance -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ?. I mean if
PO: >I thought that was happening to me, I'd search the. place from top to bottom,
PO: >I mean I live there I. would know if anything was out of place. If I was
PO: >really suspicious, I would call in one of those bug. detection teams which
PO: >have those machines that pick up the. transmitted radio waves. This
PO:. >reminds me of BUGS, that new programme on BBC1 on

That's exactly what we did. We. went to a competent, professional detective
agency in London, paid them over 400 quid to debug. our house. They used
scanner devices which go to over 1 GHz. and would pick up any nearby
transmitter. in that range, they also checked the phones and found
nothing... but if the tap was at the exchange, then they wouldn't. find
anything,. would they?

CS: >Doesn't this. suggest to you that there are, in fact, no bugs to be found?

You can assume that they've. done this sort of thing to other people in more
"serious" cases, where they would know the targets would suspect. the
presence of electronic surveillance. So they. will have developed techniques
and devices which are not readily detectable either by visual inspection. or
by electronic means. What those techniques might. be, I couldn't guess.

In this case, the existence of bugging devices was. clear from the
beginning, and they "rubbed it in" with what was said by. the boy on the
coach. It was almost as if they. wanted counter-surveillance people to be
called in, who they knew would fail. to detect the bugging devices, causing
loss of credibility to the other things I would have to say relating to. the
harassment.

I. did all the things someone in my situation would do to try to find the
bugs. In addition to. calling in professional help using electronic
counter-surveillance, I made. a close visual inspection of electrical
equipment, plus any points where audio or video. surveillance devices might
have been concealed. Of course,. I found nothing. Normal surveillance
"mini-cameras" are. quite noticeable and require visible supporting
circuitry.. It seems to me the best place to put a small video surveillance
device. would be additional to a piece of electronic equipment such as a TV
or video. It would be necessary to physically break in to a property. to fit
such a. device.

2653
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sociology Talk Forum Index -> Sociology Talk -> Future All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding Invitation
Escort e Accompagnatrici a Milano, Roma, Firenze, Bologna, Padova, Verona, Venezia
Swingers Contacts
Transportation industry
Make Your Own Website
Free phone calls to India
Long island Cleaning service
toxic mold
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
cleaning supplies
Eureka Vacuum Bags


Board Security

137 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group