Sociology Talk
Sociology Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Children 'bad for planet'

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sociology Talk Forum Index -> Sociology Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 6:09 pm    Post subject: Children 'bad for planet' Reply with quote

SUGGESTED READING FOR CONSERVATIVES, REQUIRED FOR WEE, TWEE, FEY, AND
'BORTION LUVIN' LIBS.

FROM THE TIMES OF LONDON

"Having large families should be frowned upon as an environmental
misdemeanour in the same way as frequent long-haul flights, driving a big
car and failing to reuse plastic bags, says a report to be published today
by a green think tank.

The paper by the Optimum Population Trust will say that if couples had two
children instead of three they could cut their family's carbon dioxide
output by the equivalent of 620 return flights a year between London and New
York.

John Guillebaud, co-chairman of OPT and emeritus professor of family
planning at University College London, said: "The effect on the planet of
having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other
things we might do, such as switching off lights.

"The greatest thing anyone in Britain could do to help the future of the
planet would be to have one less child."

In his latest comments, the academic says that when couples are planning a
family they should be encouraged to think about the environmental
consequences.

"The decision to have children should be seen as a very big one and one that
should take the environment into account," he added.

Professor Guillebaud says that, as a general guideline, couples should
produce no more than two offspring.

The world's population is expected to increase by 2.5 billion to 9.2 billion
by 2050. Almost all the growth will take place in developing countries.

The population of developed nations is expected to remain unchanged and
would have declined but for migration.

The British fertility rate is 1.7. The EU average is 1.5. Despite this,
Professor Guillebaud says rich countries should be the most concerned about
family size as their children have higher per capita carbon dioxide
emissions.
*****
Note at the top, this bozo already wants to make it illegal to have
children. This must be why the Birkenstock and brie bunch be loving
'bortions so bad.

Dennis
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sociology Talk Forum Index -> Sociology Talk All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding
Incall and Outcall Escorts in Milan, Rome, Florence, Naples, Turin, Venice
Swingers France
Transportation industry
personal loans
Make Your Own Website
Cheap phone calls to Pakistan
Long island Cleaning service
mold killer
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
cleaning supplies
Sanitaire Vacuum Parts


Board Security

137 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group